<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Media &#8211; KhendoFM</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.khendofm.co.ke/sub_business/media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.khendofm.co.ke</link>
	<description>Radio of Choice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 14:57:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Human Rights Watch: What Press Freedom Looks Like in Rwanda</title>
		<link>https://www.khendofm.co.ke/business/human-rights-watch-what-press-freedom-looks-like-in-rwanda/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Godwill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2021 11:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.khendofm.co.ke/?post_type=business&#038;p=32</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[HRW – Celebrating World Press Freedom Day in Rwanda may well require journalists, activists, and diplomats to toe the line of the government’s ever-growing list of forbidden topics. In a country where the president coolly gives speeches gloating about the assassination of political opponents, his 2019 warning to online critics that “they are close to the fire” and that one day “the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mb-8 md:mb-14">
<div>
<div class="article-body article-body--contained rich-text mx-auto">
<p><a href="https://www.hrw.org/news/2021/05/03/what-press-freedom-looks-rwanda" target="_blank" rel="noopener">HRW</a> – Celebrating World Press Freedom Day in Rwanda may well require journalists, activists, and diplomats to toe the line of the government’s ever-growing list of forbidden topics. In a country where the president coolly gives speeches gloating about the assassination of political opponents, his 2019 warning to online critics that “they are close to the fire” and that one day “the fire will burn them,” will likely be taken very seriously.</p>
<p>It is not unusual for Rwandan journalists to go missing, or end up dead in mysterious circumstances. Having effectively muzzled traditional media, the Rwandan authorities have turned their attention to the new medium used to broadcast information: YouTube. Judging by the crackdown documented by Human Rights Watch over the past year, the authorities have gotten very efficient at online censorship.</p>
<p>Reporting on apparently innocuous – yet critically important – topics like growing poverty under the Covid-19 lockdown, or the eviction of vulnerable populations from poor neighborhoods of Kigali, the capital, can land you in jail. Dieudonné Niyonsenga, also known as Cyuma Hassan, was the latest victim of the Rwandan authorities’ thin-skinned approach to criticism. He was accused of a range of fabricated offenses including impersonating a journalist. Niyonsenga and his driver faced a year-long trial before being acquitted.</p>
<p>He later described in interviews on YouTube that the authorities held him in multiple unknown locations, where he was threatened and told to confess to working with an exiled opposition party that has reported ties to armed groups. Since his release, his reporting on alleged military abuses has continued to cause him trouble.</p>
<p>Bloggers and other YouTube commentators told Human Rights Watch about the different tactics used to silence them. Some were offered bribes to broadcast information that bolsters the government’s line. But if they don’t agree to doing that, threats soon follow. If threats don’t suffice, then arrest is likely. Or worse.</p>
<p>On World Press Freedom Day, Rwanda’s international partners should be asking the government tough questions about media freedom and the journalists who shouldn’t have to risk their lives to do their jobs.</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="mb-8 md:mb-14">
<div class="donation-block">
<div class="donation-block__content bg-cover bg-top bg-black text-white border-t-4 border-orange-500 md:bg-center donation-block__lazy">
<div class="donation-block__content-inner p-6 background-vert md:background-horz">
<div class="donation-block__form-wrapper pt-40 sm:pt-48 md:pt-0 md:w-1/2"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Eritrea is worst country on media censorship</title>
		<link>https://www.khendofm.co.ke/business/why-eritrea-is-worst-country-on-media-censorship/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Godwill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2019 11:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.khendofm.co.ke/?post_type=business&#038;p=34</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The US-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) said on Tuesday that the worst three countries for press censorship – Eritrea, North Korea and Turkmenistan – use the media “as a mouthpiece of the state, and independent journalism is conducted from exile”. Other countries on the top 10 list “use a combination of blunt tactics like [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US-based Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) said on Tuesday that the worst three countries for press censorship – Eritrea, North Korea and Turkmenistan – use the media “as a mouthpiece of the state, and independent journalism is conducted from exile”.</p>
<p>Other countries on the top 10 list “use a combination of blunt tactics like harassment and arbitrary detention as well as sophisticated surveillance and targeted hacking to silence the independent press,” the report said. Saudi Arabia, China, Vietnam and Iran- ranked fourth to seventh, respectively – were cited in the CPJ report for “jailing and harassing journalists and their families, while also engaging in digital monitoring and censorship of the internet and social media.”</p>
<p>Equatorial Guinea, Belarus and Cuba were also named in the CPJ’s 10 most censored list. The watchdog noted that conditions for journalists and press freedom in war-ravaged countries such as Syria and Yemen are “extremely difficult, but not necessarily attributable solely to government censorship”. The rankings were based on factors including restrictions on privately-owned or independent media; criminal defamation laws; restrictions on the dissemination of false news; blocking of websites; surveillance of journalists by authorities; license requirements for media; and targeted hacking or trolling.</p>
<p>“The internet was supposed to make censorship obsolete, but that hasn’t happened,” Joel Simon, CPJ executive director, said in a statement. “Many of the world’s most censored countries are highly wired, with active online communities. These governments combine old-style brutality with new technology, often purchased from Western companies, to stifle dissent and control the media,” he said. ‘Worst jailer’ In Eritrea, the report noted, the state retains a legal monopoly of broadcast media and journalists’ alternative sources of information, such as the internet or satellite broadcasts of radio stations in exile.</p>
<p>These are restricted via government-controlled internet services. It also said that Eritrea was “the worst jailer of journalists in sub-Saharan Africa, with at least 16 journalists behind bars as of December, 2018.” “Most have been imprisoned since the 2001 crackdown, and none received a trial,” the report said, adding that “as many as seven journalists may have perished in custody.” North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has stepped up the use of radio signal blockers and advanced radio detection equipment to prevent people from sharing information, the CPJ said.</p>
<p>The report also said that Saudi Arabia’s already-repressive environment for the press has “suffered sharp deterioration” under de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman (MBS). “Anti-terror and cybercrime laws and specialised courts give authorities free rein to imprison journalists and bloggers who stray from the pro-government narrative,” CPJ said, adding that 16 journalists were behind bars as of December 1, 2018, and Saudi authorities arrested at least nine more journalists in the first half of 2019 alone.</p>
<p>China has the most sophisticated censorship apparatus, according to the CPJ, which noted that Chinese internet users are blocked by the “Great Firewall” and that authorities monitor domestic social media networks and conduct surveillance of international journalists.</p>
<p>“Both privately and state-owned news outlets are under the authorities’ supervision, and those who fail to follow the Chinese Communist Party’s directives are suspended or otherwise punished,” the report said. Whereas international journalists working in China face digital and human surveillance, with visas delayed or denied, the CPJ said.</p>
<p>Got news? <span id="eeb-629749-639756">news@khendofm.co.ke</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump treats Fox News like state-run television, journalists say</title>
		<link>https://www.khendofm.co.ke/business/trump-treats-fox-news-like-state-run-television-journalists-say/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Godwill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.khendofm.co.ke/?post_type=business&#038;p=95</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[President Donald Trump speaks about Fox News as though the network is his own state-run TV channel, journalists told CNN’s Brian Stelter on “Reliable Sources” Sunday. Trump’s flip-flopping feelings about Fox were on full display last week. After the network ran a segment on Wednesday featuring a Democratic National Committee spokesperson discussing the upcoming debate, [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Donald Trump speaks about Fox News as though the network is his own state-run TV channel, journalists told CNN’s Brian Stelter on “Reliable Sources” Sunday.</p>
<p>Trump’s flip-flopping feelings about Fox were on full display last week. After the network ran a segment on Wednesday featuring a Democratic National Committee spokesperson discussing the upcoming debate, Trump sent a tweet chastising Fox for its coverage.<br />
“The New @FoxNews is letting millions of GREAT people down!” Trump tweeted Wednesday. “We have to start looking for a new News Outlet. Fox isn’t working for us anymore!”</p>
<p>The next day, Trump called in to Fox radio host Brian Kilmeade’s show and rated various Fox reporters’ coverage of him. On Saturday, Trump praised the network on Twitter, in particular talk show host Sean Hannity and other Fox shows that are “Fair (or great) for your favorite President, me!”</p>
<p>GQ political correspondent Julia Ioffe said the suggestion that a news outlet would be “working” for the president reminds her of the way authoritarian leaders elsewhere view their own state-run media networks.</p>
<p>“It’s Dear Leader state-run TV,” Ioffe said. “The only difference is that the authoritarian leaders are a little bit more subtle in hiding their tracks and don’t air their grievances like this on the air.”</p>
<p>Fox has been known for its favorable coverage of the Trump administration, and for the revolving door of ex-Trump staffers starting jobs at Fox News and vice versa. Yet another example of that came Friday when Fox Business anchor Stuart Varney said he doesn’t believe Trump has ever lied to the American people.</p>
<p>David Zurawik, the Baltimore Sun media critic, said Varney’s comments recalled “state-run TV behind the iron curtain 1991 Czechoslovakia.”</p>
<p>But regardless of how Fox’s coverage of the president looks from one day to the next, it’s unlikely viewers would leave the network at the president’s urging, the analysts said on Sunday. While he didn’t mention it explicitly Wednesday, Trump has in the past promoted a smaller conservative channel, OANN, which has positioned itself as friendly to the president.</p>
<p>That may be why Fox has repeatedly declined to comment on this or more than a dozen previous attacks by Trump on the network, while other news outlets targeted by the president have vigorously defended their coverage. Fox News declined to comment on Sunday’s “Reliable Sources” segment.</p>
<p>“Fox knows it has the leverage in this relationship,” said Elaina Plott, a CNN analyst and White House correspondent for The Atlantic.<br />
“I think that if Donald Trump were to try to command his supporters to, what, go start to watch OANN exclusively? I mean, no, it’s not going to happen. It’s one of those few moments, I think, when you look at the president’s dynamic with any entity, person, in the United States, that they are the ones that actually hold the cards here,” Plott said.</p>
<p>While the network declined to comment on Trump’s remarks, Fox senior political analyst Brit Hume replied to Trump on Wednesday, saying: “Fox News isn’t supposed to work for you.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Amazon bought a piece of the Yankees’ TV network</title>
		<link>https://www.khendofm.co.ke/business/why-amazon-bought-a-piece-of-the-yankees-tv-network/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Godwill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.khendofm.co.ke/?post_type=business&#038;p=93</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tech giants like Amazon (AMZN) have been jockeying over the last few years for the rights to livestream sports on their platforms. With a glut of streaming options available, people have fewer reasons to watch live TV. Sports is the valuable exception. Amazon wants to come out on top in the era of cord-cutting and [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tech giants like Amazon (AMZN) have been jockeying over the last few years for the rights to livestream sports on their platforms. With a glut of streaming options available, people have fewer reasons to watch live TV. Sports is the valuable exception.</p>
<p>Amazon wants to come out on top in the era of cord-cutting and live sports is another way for the online retailer to incentivize consumers to sign up with Amazon Prime, the yearly subscription service that gives users access to free two-day shipping and other features that are otherwise not available, including Prime Video. The company has been investing more in Prime Video, which hosts exclusive, prestige content and livestreams of football, soccer, tennis and volleyball.</p>
<p>Now it appears that Amazon is ready to do more with live sports by taking on the biggest market in the country.</p>
<p>On Thursday, Amazon secured rights to the YES Network, the country’s most-watched regional sports network. It’s the home to live games and programming focused around New York teams including the Brooklyn Nets, the WNBA’s New York Liberty and most importantly, the New York Yankees. Amazon’s stake in YES is small but meaningful because the Bronx Bombers are more than just a regional team. With star players like Aaron Judge and 27 World Series championships, the Yankees are an iconic global brand.</p>
<p>Amazon executives spoke about their ambitions in live sports at the Hashtag Sports conference in New York City in June. Felicia Yue, senior manager at Amazon Prime Video, positioned the company as a perfect destination for sports viewing in the cord-cutting era.<br />
“As everybody knows, the younger generations are all about streaming. They don’t have a cable package. They aren’t going to turn on a Fox package, but they might turn on Thursday Night Football on Amazon,” Yue said at the conference.</p>
<p>Amazon revealed its interest in live sports in 2017 when it partnered with the NFL to stream “Thursday Night Football,” making that season’s games available to anyone with an Amazon Prime subscription. The one-year deal included 10 games and cost Amazon $50 million. The NFL renewed the deal with Amazon for the 2018 and 2019 seasons.</p>
<p>Amazon has also offered programming from other sports leagues. In the US, Prime Video also livestreams professional volleyball with the AVP league and the Laver Cup tennis tournament. In the U.K., Amazon also has exclusive rights to the 2019 US Open tennis tournament as part of a five-year deal. Starting this December, Amazon will offer 20 Premier league games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>China expels Wall Street Journal reporter following report on President Xi Jinping’s cousin</title>
		<link>https://www.khendofm.co.ke/business/china-expels-wall-street-journal-reporter-following-report-on-president-xi-jinpings-cousin/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Godwill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.khendofm.co.ke/?post_type=business&#038;p=91</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal’s publisher confirmed Friday that Chinese authorities have declined to renew one of its reporters’ press credentials, effectively expelling him from the country, following an investigative story he worked on about a cousin of Chinese President Xi Jinping. Beijing-based reporter Chun Han Wong was the co-author of a report published in the [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Wall Street Journal’s publisher confirmed Friday that Chinese authorities have declined to renew one of its reporters’ press credentials, effectively expelling him from the country, following an investigative story he worked on about a cousin of Chinese President Xi Jinping.</p>
<p>Beijing-based reporter Chun Han Wong was the co-author of a report published in the Journal last month that detailed alleged involvement of Xi’s cousin in high-stakes gambling and potential money laundering in Australia.<br />
When asked about Wong’s effective expulsion, the Chinese government insisted that it handles foreign journalists’ press credentials in accordance with law.</p>
<p>“We are firmly opposed to the malicious smearing and attacks against China by certain foreign journalists, who are not welcome in China,” the Chinese foreign ministry said in a statement Friday. “At the same time, we will facilitate newsgathering work that complies with laws and regulations for foreign journalists in China.”</p>
<p>The Journal reported Friday on Wong’s removal from China, linking Beijing’s decision to his story last month.<br />
“Mr. Xi’s private life and that of his relatives are considered sensitive by Chinese authorities,” the Journal said in its story. “Prior to publication, (foreign) ministry officials urged the Journal not to publish and warned of unspecified consequences.”<br />
Journal publisher Dow Jones said it would “continue to look into the matter.”</p>
<p>Wong, a Singaporean national, began working in Beijing for the Journal in 2014 and his credentials had been approved annually until this time, according to the newspaper.</p>
<p>The Foreign Correspondents’ Club of China (FCCC) protested the decision, saying in a statement that it “condemns in the strongest possible terms the use of visa non-renewal as a form of punishment.”</p>
<p>“Expulsions of journalists from China amount to an extreme attempt by Chinese authorities to punish news organizations that conduct factual work that does not cast the country or its leadership in a flattering light,” the statement said. “Such treatment of foreign correspondents run completely counter to Chinese claims that it supports openness and inclusiveness. Such actions should raise further concerns as China prepares to host major global events, such as the Winter Olympics in 2022.”</p>
<p>Wong is the sixth journalist to be forced out of China under such circumstances since 2013, according to the FCCC statement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood’s summer fizzled…except for Disney</title>
		<link>https://www.khendofm.co.ke/business/hollywoods-summer-fizzledexcept-for-disney/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Godwill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.khendofm.co.ke/?post_type=business&#038;p=89</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The summer movie season has done little to help ease a bumpy year at the box office. Revenue from the summer, which stretches from the first Friday in May to Labor Day, is roughly 2% behind last year. The drop is not disastrous (it was down 14% two summers ago), but it does burden a [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The summer movie season has done little to help ease a bumpy year at the box office.</p>
<p>Revenue from the summer, which stretches from the first Friday in May to Labor Day, is roughly 2% behind last year. The drop is not disastrous (it was down 14% two summers ago), but it does burden a domestic box office that is already down 6% overall.<br />
That’s not to say there weren’t any bright spots. “Spider-Man: Far From Home” was the first film in the series to make more than $1 billion worldwide. “John Wick: Chapter 3 — Parabellum” and Quentin Tarantino’s “Once Upon a Time In Hollywood, two R-rated films, both found an audience. But this summer’s slate of films mostly didn’t “live up to the hype,” according to Paul Dergarabedian, senior media analyst at Comscore (SCOR).</p>
<p>“Brands still matter, but you have to have content that delivers and offers the moviegoer an exciting in-theater experience,” Dergarabedian told CNN Business. “Short of that, audiences today have way too many options to settle for just an OK experience.”<br />
The summer was especially harsh for sequels like “Men In Black: International” and “Dark Phoenix,” both of which failed to meet industry expectations. “Dark Phoenix,” made only $252 million globally, which makes it the lowest-grossing film in the otherwise lucrative X-Men franchise.</p>
<p>If it was a rough summer for sequels, it was even worse for comedies.<br />
Universal’s “Good Boys” and “Yesterday” are the only comedies in the top twenty highest-grossing films of the summer. Other such as “Long Shot,” “Stuber” and “Late Night” fell short at the box office.</p>
<p>“Movies are like coffee, they’re better when they’re fresh,” Dergarabedian said. “Many of this summer’s sequels and comedies seemed derivative and lacked a fresh perspective. That was met with indifference from audiences.”</p>
<p>The summer of Disney<br />
The summer may have been lackluster for just about everyone else in Hollywood, but it wasn’t for Disney (DIS), which produced three of the top five highest-grossing films of the summer.</p>
<p>“The Lion King” and “Toy Story 4” are at No. 1 and No. 2, respectively. The live action remake of “Aladdin” came in at No. 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
